Short- and Long-term Risk of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery in Acute Coronary Syndrome
pp. 462-467
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7775/rac.v82.i6.4503Keywords:
Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery, Coronary Disease, Acute Myocardial InfarctionAbstract
Introduction: Percutaneous coronary intervention is the revascularization procedure most widely used in patients with nonST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS). However, coronary artery bypass graft surgery is a therapeutic alternative which allows treating these patients with a favorable outcome.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare in-hospital and long-term outcome of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery according to their clinical presentation.
Methods: Between January 1998 and July 2013, 3604 consecutive patients underwent isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The population was divided in patients with NSTEACS (ACS Group, n = 2079) or with chronic stable angina (CSA Group, n = 1525). Postoperative and at follow-up morbidity and mortality were analyzed.
Results: The CSA Group had greater use of double mammary artery (58.2% vs. 50.3%; p = 0.001) and longer operative time (211 min vs. 203 min; p = 0.002). The ACS Group presented lower postoperative cardiac output (4.5% vs. 3.1%; p = 0.043) and higher in-hospital mortality (2.8% vs. 1.8%; p = 0.046). After adjusting for risk score, there were no statistically significant differences in in-hospital mortality (1.3% in CSA vs. 1.6% in ACS; p = 0.681) or in the rate of postoperative complications between the two groups. Overall long-term survival at 10 years was not different between groups (CSA 85% ± 1.3% vs. ACS 83% ± 1.1%; p = 0.363). The time-related freedom from reintervention was similar for both groups (CSA 89.5% ± 1.2% vs. ACS 89.1% ± 0.9%; p = 0.1680). These results did not change after adjusting for risk score.
Conclusions: Patients with NSTEACS submitted to coronary artery bypass graft surgery presented greater perioperative mortality, but a long-term outcome similar to patients undergoing elective surgery. No difference in perioperative mortality was found between both groups after adjusting for risk score.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Argentine Journal of Cardiology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.








