Barriers and Procedures to Reduce Treatment Delay in ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome with Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. 20-Year Experience of a Tertiary Care Center in a Densely Populated City

pp 105-112

Authors

  • Federico Blanco Servicio de Hemodinamia. Hospital Gral. de Agudos Dr. Cosme Argerich. CABA https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3671-7359
  • Jorge Szarfer Servicio de Hemodinamia. Hospital Gral. de Agudos Dr. Cosme Argerich. CABA https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1254-3929
  • Alejandro García Escudero Servicio de Hemodinamia. Hospital Gral. de Agudos Dr. Cosme Argerich. CABA
  • Rodrigo Blanco Servicio de Hemodinamia. Hospital Gral. de Agudos Dr. Cosme Argerich. CABA
  • Federico Albornoz Servicio de Hemodinamia. Hospital Gral. de Agudos Dr. Cosme Argerich. CABA
  • Analía Alonso Servicio de Hemodinamia. Hospital Gral. de Agudos Dr. Cosme Argerich. CABA
  • Vielka Yurko Servicio de Hemodinamia. Hospital Gral. de Agudos Dr. Cosme Argerich. CABA https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3787-5295
  • Susana Affatato Servicio de Hemodinamia. Hospital Gral. de Agudos Dr. Cosme Argerich. CABA
  • Matías Feldman Servicio de Hemodinamia. Hospital Gral. de Agudos Dr. Cosme Argerich. CABA https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8223-434X
  • Gerardo Gigena Servicio de Hemodinamia. Hospital Gral. de Agudos Dr. Cosme Argerich. CABA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7775/rac.es.v89.i2.19989

Keywords:

Acute Coronary Syndrome, ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction, Time Factor, Time, to, Treatment, Angioplasty

Abstract

Background: The delay to reperfusion of ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (STEACS) is a key factor in its prognosis, and its reduction could reduce morbidity and mortality.

Objective: The aim of this study was to identify and modify the barriers detected in 20 years of STEACS treatment in a tertiary care center of a densely populated city to evaluate their effect on the outcome of the procedure.

Methods: A total of 3007 patients with STEACS within 12 hours of symptoms onset were prospectively and consecutively included
to undergo primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2019. Time from symptoms
onset to balloon inflation was divided into intervals. After barriers were identified (2000-2009), the procedure was changed. The population was divided into two groups (G) G1: pre implementation (2000-2009) and G2: post-implementation (2010-2019) of changes.

Results: G1 included 1409 and G2 1598 patients with no demographic differences except for the type of PCI. Delays were identified in diagnosis, communication between physicians, transfer and admission of the patient to the hemodynamics lab. Procedural changes decreased first medical contact-hemodynamic team contact interval [G1: 90 min (36-168) vs. G2: 77 min (36-144) p <0.01] and hemodynamic team contact-hemodynamics lab admission interval [G1: 75 min (55-100) vs. G2: 51 min (34-70) p <0.01] and reduced in-hospital (G1: 9,2% vs. G2: 6,7% p <0,01) and 6-month (G1: 13.1% vs. G2: 7.5% p <0. 01) mortality.

Conclusions: Delay in diagnosis, difficulty in communication and type of transfer were the most important causes of delay. Implementing a procedural protocol reduced delays. Continuous evaluation of results and permanent education constitute the fundamental cornerstones for optimizing network care programs.

Published

2025-04-23

Issue

Section

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>