Public Health at the Center of Debate

pp. 371-373

Authors

  • Andrés Rosende Consultor Internacional para la Iniciativa HEARTS en las Américas. Departamento de Enfermedades No Transmisibles y Salud Mental, Organización Panamericana de la Salud (OPS), Washington, D. C., Estados Unidos de América https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8173-0686

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7775/rac.v91i6.274

Abstract

Charask et al. reveal the sudden increase in specific mortality rate for myocardial infarction during the two years of Social, Preventive and Mandatory Isolation (SPMI) and its particular impact on women and subjects <60 years. At this point, other questions should be posed. Are these two circumstances related? Can we infer causality? Could the pandemic effect on infarct mortality have been avoided or at least mitigated?... The study by Charask et al. is undoubtedly an essential element in this debate, and disregarding its results, or not learn from them, would be a highly costly error for the health of the Argentine population

How to cite this article:

Rosende A. Public Health at the Center of Debate. Rev Argent Cardiol. 2023;91:371-373. http://dx.doi.org/10.7775/rac.v91.i6.20706

Published

2024-01-18

Most read articles by the same author(s)