Behavior of Retrograde Conduction Time at Supraventricular Tachycardia Induction and its Role in Differential Diagnosis

pp. 110-118

Abstract

Background: Differential diagnosis between orthodromic reentrant tachycardia (ORT) and atypical nodal reentrant tachycardia (ANRT) can be challenging. Our hypothesis was that ANRT presents more variability in retrograde conduction time at tachycardia onset than ORT.
Objectives: The objectives of this study were to assess retrograde conduction time variability at the start of tachycardia in ANRT and ORT, and postulate a new diagnostic tool to differentiate these two types of arrhythmias.
Methods: The ventriculoatrial (VA) interval of the first beats after tachycardia induction was measured until stabilization. The difference between the maximum and minimum VA interval was defined as delta VA (ΔVA), and the number of beats needed for VA interval stabilization was also assessed. Atrial tachycardias were excluded.
Results: In a total of 101 patients included in the study, ORT was diagnosed in 64 patients and ANRT in 37. ΔVA interval was 0 (interquartile range [IQR] 0-5) milliseconds (ms) in ORT vs. 40 (21-55) ms in ANRT (p <0.001). The VA interval significantly stabilized earlier in ORT (1.5 [1-3] beats) than in ANRT (5 [4-7] beats) (p<0.001). A ΔVA <10 ms diagnosed ORT with 100% sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. Ventriculoatrial interval stabilization in less than 3 beats predicted ORT with good diagnostic accuracy. The results were similar considering only accessory septal pathways. Typical NRTs presented an intermediate variation.
Conclusion: Presence of ΔVA <10 ms is a simple criterion that accurately differentiates ORT from ANRT, independently of the accessory
pathway localization.

How to cite this article:

Hadid C, Celano L, Di Toro D, Antezana- Chavéz E, Gallino S, Iralde G, Atea L, González S, Maldonado S, Labadet C, et al. Behavior of Retrograde Conduction Time at Supraventricular Tachycardia Induction and its Role in Differential Diagnosis. Rev Argent Cardiol 2023;91:110-8
https://doi.org/10.7775/rac.v91.i2.20611