Atrial Septal Defect Assessed by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: Comparison with Doppler Echocardiography

pp 30-35

Authors

  • Ricardo Obregon Chief of the Echocardiography and Doppler Service. In charge of the Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Unit. Imaging Services, Magnetic
  • Edgar García Staff physisian at the Instituto de Cardiología de Corrientes
  • Raúl Peloso Chief of the Imaging Department at the Instituto de Cardiología de Corrientes
  • Liliana Ferrin Staff physisian at the Instituto de Cardiología de Corrientes
  • Teresita Escudero Staff physisian at the Instituto de Cardiología de Corrientes
  • Valeria Franciossi Resident physisian at the Instituto de Cardiología de Corrientes
  • Natalia Cocco Resident physisian at the Instituto de Cardiología de Corrientes
  • Raúl Cayre Full Member of the Sociedad Argentina de Cardiología. Development Anatomy Section, School of Medicine, UNNE, Corrientes, Argentina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7775/rac.v75i1.2534

Keywords:

Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Echocardiography, Atrial Septal Defect

Abstract

Atrial septal defect (ASD) is one of the most frequent congenital defects diagnosed in adult patients. Doppler echocardiography (DE) is the method of choice for its diagnosis and fol-low-up. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), with its multiple applications, may be an excellent alternative for the assessment of this disorder. To analyze the usefulness of CMR in ASD, we evaluated 30 patients with ASD and compared the results with those of DE. Twenty three patients had a ostium secundum type of ASD, 6 had a sinus venous ASD and 1 had an ostium primum ASD. There was good correlation between CMR and DE in the aortic flows (r=0.67, p <0.007), pulmonary flows (r=0.62, p<0.01) and Qp/Qs (r=0.56, p<0.003). The frontal view of the ASD could only be assessed with CMR, which also allowed quantifying the flow through the defect. Direct planimetry of the ASD correlated adequately with quantitative pulmonary flow and the flow through the interatrial defect; additionally, the results obtained with both techniques were confirmed by CMR. We conclude that CMR correlates well with DE and is a valid alternative for the assessment of ASD. The frontal visualization of the defect and its flow quantification represent an advantage of CMR over DE.

Published

2026-01-06

Issue

Section

ORIGINAL ARTICLES